|
|
Post by BugHunter on Jan 29, 2007 21:43:50 GMT -5
That game was featured on the New York Times and has won a couple of awards already. Its been quite a phenomenon and several clones have already appeared. I actually spent an hour playing it when i first encountered it.
|
|
SoA
New User
Posts: 86
|
Post by SoA on Jan 30, 2007 19:09:51 GMT -5
|
|
zoner
Intermediate
Quickly! To the PopeMobile!
Posts: 260
|
Post by zoner on Jan 30, 2007 20:33:15 GMT -5
i played linerider when a kid from my advanced education class introduced me to it. I couldn't get the little scarf guy to stay on the ramps. damned two-dimensional realm. edit: l337n355 new link: www.catandgirl.com/view.php?loc=20 |
|
|
|
Post by daft alchemist on Feb 21, 2007 13:44:42 GMT -5
This link is a little amusing but mostly disturbing. Very mostly disturbing. But I can't keep it to myself. This is the kind of thing you just have to share.  www.neuticles.com/index1.html |
|
Jalathas
Forum Frequent
Dovie'andi se tovya sagain
Posts: 1,076
|
Post by Jalathas on Feb 21, 2007 13:59:28 GMT -5
...ew
|
|
|
|
Post by Cobra5 on Feb 21, 2007 14:20:58 GMT -5
Why did you post that...?
Also the youtube thing has been removed. Oh well.
And the comic. Is that a comic you read? I've never seen it before.
|
|
|
|
Post by daft alchemist on Feb 21, 2007 15:15:09 GMT -5
Will, I was not born to make sense. Asking questions like that is almost like asking someone a Chinese proverb question. If a tree falls and no one is around, does it make a sound? When Sarah posts a link, why is it disturbing and innapropriate? The world may never know. In fact, it probably won't ever know. So that's half the battle lost already.  |
|
|
|
Post by Cobra5 on Feb 21, 2007 18:35:40 GMT -5
...oh.
|
|
zoner
Intermediate
Quickly! To the PopeMobile!
Posts: 260
|
Post by zoner on Feb 21, 2007 18:40:10 GMT -5
i've just read that one and the first 312 ones.
|
|
|
|
Post by BugHunter on Feb 22, 2007 0:00:43 GMT -5
...
|
|
Jalathas
Forum Frequent
Dovie'andi se tovya sagain
Posts: 1,076
|
Post by Jalathas on Feb 27, 2007 16:15:11 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Cobra5 on Feb 27, 2007 16:26:08 GMT -5
Try reading the scientific explinations on time travel... Cass, as a sick joke, got a me a moderate-level physics book for christmas... Anyway, I hold the belief that if the past will be changed, it already has been changed. Thus if you go back in time to change something, something happens and the future ends up being exactly the same anyway. Like you go back in time to kill someones grandpa, so they won't exist in the future. So you kill the husband of his grandma, and in her grief, she meets a new man, who is in fact the real grandpa, so in effect, you have only created the future that already exists. etc. Things like that make for a better story anyway.  |
|
|
|
Post by daft alchemist on Feb 27, 2007 16:28:18 GMT -5
In a way, you are kind of referencing Futurama there, Will. Also, I'm not in the right mood to read all of that, but I do find it funny how at the bottom of the page about time travel, there's an ad for something religious. It tickles my fancy for some reason. |
|
|
|
Post by Cobra5 on Feb 27, 2007 16:30:05 GMT -5
No I didn't have futurama in mind. But I guess that does follow almost the exact same rules and example I mentioned.
|
|
|
|
Post by Tassatul on Feb 27, 2007 16:50:44 GMT -5
I'm more of the belief that yes, you can go back and change the past, but it won't affect your future. It will only create another timeline. Alternate realities, basically.
|
|
