|
Post by BugHunter on Feb 14, 2007 9:19:10 GMT -5
still kinda fits
|
|
|
Post by daft alchemist on Feb 15, 2007 10:29:11 GMT -5
My guess it's the anti-Valentine's holiday created by bitter singles who really just wnated to be loved on V-day. My guess is that I'm also right in guessing that.
|
|
|
Post by Cobra5 on Feb 15, 2007 10:50:40 GMT -5
Wow.
|
|
|
Post by BugHunter on Feb 15, 2007 14:30:47 GMT -5
deep. I so couldn't figure that out by myself. Somebody get her a sandwich, she totally deserves it.
|
|
Jalathas
Forum Frequent
Dovie'andi se tovya sagain
Posts: 1,076
|
Post by Jalathas on Feb 15, 2007 15:30:13 GMT -5
My guess it's the anti-Valentine's holiday created by bitter singles who really just wnated to be loved on V-day. My guess is that I'm also right in guessing that. Not really. I consider it more of a holiday for those for whom Valentines day was just another Wednesday. There's no bitterness here.
|
|
|
Post by daft alchemist on Feb 15, 2007 15:50:43 GMT -5
I'm not saying you're bitter. I'm just saying that's probably the origin of it.
Kind of like how Native Americans made an anti-thanksgiving holiday since the pilgrims killed so many of their people. That's a worthy cause though, I'd say.
|
|
|
Post by Tassatul on Feb 15, 2007 18:07:51 GMT -5
Ehhhh. Thanksgiving is about giving thanks (hello?) not about what the Pilgrims did to the Indians. People need to grow up.
|
|
|
Post by BugHunter on Feb 15, 2007 21:38:38 GMT -5
well put.
|
|
|
Post by daft alchemist on Feb 16, 2007 0:12:44 GMT -5
Well, I'm thinking that to full-blooded Native Americans, it's not a day for giving thanks of any sort, m'kay? I forget what they call that day...something like day of mourning or something...I forget.
|
|
|
Post by Cobra5 on Feb 16, 2007 3:11:55 GMT -5
Right.
Well.
...right...
...i like thanksgiving...
|
|
|
Post by Tassatul on Feb 16, 2007 15:08:02 GMT -5
You're missing my point, though. Thanksgiving is supposed to be about giving thanks, and being happy about the things in life that are going well. Exploiting and murdering Native Americans 3 and 4 hundred years ago is not what we are celebrating when we sit down for a plate of turkey, and so once again, while killing the Indians was wrong and bad, it has nothing to do with Thanksgiving.
|
|
|
Post by daft alchemist on Feb 16, 2007 15:21:53 GMT -5
Look, I have nothing agains the commercialization of holidays. Easter is about a bunnies and colored eggs, halloween is about costumes and candy, and christmas is about a fat man in a red suit spoiling little kids. But the fact that the pilgrims sat down and made up a holiday after murdering indians and taking their food and their supplies just doesn't sit well with me. Especially since you go to school and learn how the indians helped the pilgrims and they were buddies and all that junk that's really nice to believe, but totally not the truth. I'm not saying I'm against thanksgiving. I'm all for any holiday that gives me an excuse to eat pumpkin pie.
|
|
|
Post by Cobra5 on Feb 16, 2007 17:17:52 GMT -5
Thanksgiving.
Was.
Not.
Made.
By.
Pilgrims.
That was when our modern Thanksgiving holiday came about. During the civil war, created by Abraham Lincoln, to give thanks that despite we may kill eachother, and we may have evil among us, we persevere, and continue to prosper.
On top of this.
The idea of "Thanksgiving" as it is, but before the contemporary holiday existed, was a holiday among all nations, including the native Americans. Practically every culture in the world had a harvest festival, now remember, this was a time when all food came from agriculture, and how much people got to eat depended year-to-year on the harvest, even in fully industrialized nations.
The story of "the first thanksgiving" as it is told today, having taken place between Indians and pilgrims, or somehow being a product of that time period, comes from when Squanto taught the pilgrims how to survive in the New World. The pilgrim's European crops and practices failed wholly in the new world, and Squanto- who spoke English, as he once served as a slave in Europe, and thus knew fully the treachery of "the White Man"- taught them proper methods and also gave them crops to allow them to survive (crops which quickly spread back to Europe, and are now seen over the whole world including potatoes, tomatoes, and corn). Again- the celebration between the native Americans and the Pilgrims is in no way related to modern thanksgiving, other then the popularization of the story of "the First Thanksgiving", which is largely a commercial practice (and, as you said above in exact words, you have nothing against the commercialization of holidays). The idea of pilgrims or indians being involved in thanksgiving is similar, I suppose, to rabbits or eggs being involved in Easter, but that's a story I don't know.
A festival to give thanks to their respective Gods or powers for their year's harvest already existed in both cultures. That year they held their festivals together with eachother, though no part of this celebration was at the time marked as any special holiday like modern thanksgiving.
Before this, even. Spanish explorers in (what is now) Texas held a celebration to rest and give thanks for their survival. This one was called thanksgiving and a lot of people point it out as being the actual "first thanksgiving" (though whether or not that's true, I don't know). Indians were not involved in that celebration at all.
In addition. There is no native American holiday on thanksgiving to mourn for their ancestors. That was made up by Jeffery Rowland, the same guy who popularized "Snakes on a Plane", in his web comic "Overcompensating". Some Native Americans do hold special remembrances or have some mourning practices, but they are all individual. As a culture, or as any particular native American culture, there are no special practices, and certainly no "National Mourning Day" (As Jeffery Rowland put it).
If there is such a thing, it is certainly well hidden from us white men, as I have never heard a word about it.
|
|
|
Post by Cobra5 on Feb 16, 2007 17:35:37 GMT -5
After a search there is a group who calls their remembrance "National Day of Mourning".
But, still, it is an individual thing (despite having "national" in its name) and isn't recognized by the native American community at large (or America at large, for that matter).
They travel to Plymouth rock, and give speeches and stuff. It was started in 1970 by a native American activist but it is now attended by many minority groups (including, for example, blacks and gays).
The only time it really appeared in the mainstream was in 1997, it became violent and the police had to break it up.
So I guess it wasn't really made up by Jeffery Rowland, the idea of "National Day of Mourning", but the idea its held by native Americans across the country, or that all native Americans mourn on thanksgiving, is false.
|
|
|
Post by daft alchemist on Feb 16, 2007 19:45:43 GMT -5
I'm not saying they all do. They sure have reason to. I feel bad for what happened to them. My Comp & Lit 2 prof openly admitted to being a white-basher though he himself was a white man. He had one of those shirts that shows native americans with their fighting gear and whatever rifles they found that calls them the original anti-terrorism group. It's just hurtful to me. The junk they spew at you when you're a child to make you think things are happy and good, and then you grow up and learn that Lincoln didn't actually mean to free the slaves and all those good things. Completely ruining role models, or at least it did for me with good ole' Abe. But oh well.
|
|