Nomic (OOC/Proposals thread)

[Coral]

I decline to deny your request.

[Aikanaro]

Excellent then - there is no more unanimity.

I propose the following:

305. The IC thread will be restarted.

306. Every rule must be numbered by the person proposing it, failing to do so will result in that proposal being ignored. The rules thread will have its numbering fixed up so that it works by the rules, even if it is not an entirely accurate transcript of the rules proposed (Because I fucked it up... )

307. Rule 303 will be enacted.

The recognised genre of the RP is to be 'cyberprep', as defined by Wikipedia. The inclusion of elements from other genres will be regulated by voting, and is to be proposed in the OOC discussion thread before they are included. The dystopian elements of the game that have been introduced so far will remain, but any wish to include further elements of this nature will be put to vote.

308. Coral, if he wishes to play, must first submit a character here to have it voted on as a proposal. A majority vote can eject him from the game at any time.

309. Anyone deemed guilty of the offense of 'godmoding' will be brought to trial. If found guilty by the majority of people, their actions may be retconned and they may be forced to have a probationary period where they a) cannot introduce new characters without approval, and b) can be ejected by certain people elected to supervise them.

(309 needs some serious suggestions to make it less crappy, methinks...)

[Coral]

I will accept on the condition that your rule #308 is amended to the following:

Any player be ejected by a majority vote; and all players must submit a character here to be accepted by a majority vote.

and also, I elect that rule 309 be removed from the list because I find the

b) can be ejected by certain people elected to supervise them

is very stupid. If the person is elected, there will be only -2- people able to vote for this supervisor. And if they both vote for themselves....

[Jalathas]

I agree with the amendment of 308, but not with the removal of 309. If both vote for themselves, the accused could, I suppose, make the tie-breaking vote. By the way, was your vote on the last proposal yes or no? The wording is kind of confusing.

[Coral]

Its a double-negative, which is a positive. In short, I said a yes.

As for 309, the accused could vote for his or herself and thus not be on probation, -or- not vote at all.

[Jalathas]

I guess the ejection part is a bit repetitive anyways, so that part could be removed and just allow them to be watched by all the players.

[Coral]

Yeah, thats true. Besides, we could jsut get of rule 309, because if the player godmodes, the other players can vote him or her recieving the boot in the booty.

[Jalathas]

I guess. Although technically, I hold the key vote in 309. I'm not taking bribes! Unless they're really good bribes...

[Aikanaro]

I agree with the first part of the amended 308, but the second I'm leary about. I like the idea of being able to come up with characters on the fly when they're needed, and was planning to make a proposal at some point to encourage multiple characters ... on the other hand, I don't trust you

309 is slightly redundant with this, so I suppose it can be nixed. 308 can cover our kicking people out rule for now, and we can come up with a more refined system when we need it or can think up one that works.

Also - we should be getting another player shortly.

[Jalathas]

Right, let's dump 309, make 308 say that any player may be ejected by a majority vote, and if a character already in the game is deemed unworthy by a majority vote, a new one must be created if the player wishes to continue playing.

[Aikanaro]

Done.

308. A player can be ejected from the game by a majority vote. If a character that has been entered into the game is deemed unworthy by a majority vote, a new one must be created if the player wishes to continue playing. The character which was voted out will either become an NPC, or have its exit from the game justified in some way by its player.

[Jalathas]

Then I vote yes on all your proposals.

[copyKatt]

okay.. whoa.. i should have just stayed on the boat when it first left shore instead of trying to wade through 4 pages of change this amend that, lol

but the fact is that i did. so here i am. i thought i heard somewhere that you guys were restarting the IC thread becuase someone's house got torched. harsh. but if thats the case, then im willing to join. if not, then give me a day or so to catch up with whats going on in the IC thread. my surname starts with 'De' if its still of any relevance. i have to overlook the turn basis rule again, i do beleive.

so if my two cents count or not yet, ill just say that i approve that rule... i actually think that rule should go for all rpgs here...

[edit]okay, i just read the IC thread, and i just have to say that coral, you are one horrible godmodder. but youve already been repremanded for that. so lets get on with life [/edit]

[Coral]

Godmodding is fun =P. I TOLD you people I was bad at normal roleplaying! But noooo.... "you'll be an ok rper"

[Aikanaro]

Well, at any rate, how do you vote for this latest proposal?